Similar Posts

9 Comments

  1. Having pure thoughts is very difficult. Controlling our actions is much more achievable. I would hope that we are judged by our actions. The Taryag mitzvot are geared to doing and preventing actions. The only Mitzva where we are culpable is Avodah Zara.

    1. As you say, controlling one's thoughts is most difficult. But it says in Yoma 29a, הִרְהוּרֵי עֲבֵירָה קָשׁוּ מֵעֲבֵירָה, thoughts of sin are more difficult than sins [themselves], meaning that they are much more damaging than the action themselves. It is also stated in Berachot 12b, ״אַחֲרֵי עֵינֵיכֶם״ זֶה הִרְהוּר עֲבֵירָה, which is a direct quote from the Shema, that we are commanded not to stray after our eyes, which concerns thoughts of sin, particularly licentious fantasies. Therefore, we see that we are commanded concerning thoughts, particularly in this area. That's why Chazal teach that even looking at the little finger of a woman and entertaining inappropriate thoughts is assur. There is much more about this in halachah, and even in the Shulchan Aruch. But anyway, that is a separate inyan than what we've written about here. Here, we are trying to demonstrate that even someone who is generally shomer mitzvot, etc. can still be receiving the Torah as a poison if his mind is corrupt with illicit thoughts.

      1. I was aware of all your citations. But Hashem does not punish us for our thoughts. See Kiddushin 39B. The exception is idolatry based on a verse from Yechezkel 14:5. That's what I was referring to. Certain thoughts are prohibited but not punished.

        1. The topic of Hashem 'punishing' us a big one — beyond the scope of our discussion here. But it could be that if what you are saying is true (and I'm not so sure it is true), it could be because He doesn't need to. We do the punishment all by ourselves.

      1. Not sure what you mean by 'culpable' but the halachah forbids two kinds of forbidden thoughts, not just avodah zarah, but also thoughts of zinut as well, which is explicitly mentioned in the 3rd paragraph of the Shema, therefore, it's an issur d'oraita. For example, Even ha-Ezer 21:5: אסור להשתמש באשה כלל בין גדולה בין קטנה בין שפחה בין משוחררת שמא יבא לידי הרהור עבירה — notice that the halachah states that illicit thoughts are a sin. Also, 21:1 says ואסור להסתכל בבגדי צבעונים של אשה שהוא מכירה אפי' אינם עליה שמא יבא להרהר בה, which makes it clear that even looking at a woman's colored clothing even when they're not on her is an issur because it could lead to forbidden thoughts. It also says in Baba Batra 164b: אָמַר רַב עַמְרָם אָמַר רַב: שָׁלֹשׁ עֲבֵירוֹת אֵין אָדָם נִיצּוֹל מֵהֶן בְּכׇל יוֹם – הִרְהוּר עֲבֵירָה, וְעִיּוּן תְּפִלָּה, וְלָשׁוֹן הָרָע — which again mentions sinful thoughts. Steinsaltz says this refers to thoughts of zinut. The Yad Ramah also indicates it refers to zinut.

          1. Thanks for the clarification between prohibited vs punishable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *